This message was deleted.
# rke2
a
This message was deleted.
w
RKE2 isn't forked from K3s. Have you seen https://www.suse.com/c/rancher_blog/when-to-use-k3s-and-rke2/ ?
🙌 1
r
I thought I remembered hearing that k3s was upstream from RKE2 from someone from Rancher on here, but it's a hazy memory. Thanks for the link
a
Neither K3s or RKE2 are forks. They are distributions. They are also both fully conformant distributions as well. RKE2 and K3s share some architectural decisions, namely distribution as a single binary, support for a native
helmchart
kind, etc. However there are differences, for example, RKE2 being compiled with a FIPS-compliant compiler, k3s having support for ARM, etc. K3s largely achieves being more lightweight by removing depreciated in-tree cloud and storage providers (out of tree providers can, and should be leveraged), packaging a single binary enables shared caching, plus also allowing additional datastore backends other than etcd.
🙌 1
c
RKE2 does share some components but of course it's a CNCF certified distro
Your friend is also wrong anyway because k3s is also a certified distro 😄