Channels
extensions
rancher-extensions
supermicro-sixsq
ozt
os
one-point-x
rio
onlinemeetup
v16-v21-migration
events
onlinetraining
training-1220
training-0110
training-0124
k3s-contributor
submariner
storage
k3os
windows
ci-cd
theranchcast
rfed_ara
nederlands
ukranian
danish
training-0131
masterclass
training-0207
training-0214
terraform-controller
epinio
phillydotnet
swarm
rancher-wrangler
deutsch
russian
chinese
mesos
français
japanese
arm
longhorn-dev
terraform-provider-rke
service-mesh
azure
gcp
academy
random
elemental
espanol
lima
harvester-dev
portugues
kubernetes
kim
hypper
kubewarden
opni
logging
neuvector-security
rancher-setup
developer
office-hours
mexico
cabpr
rke
vsphere
longhorn-storage
k3s
k3d
terraform-provider-rancher2
fleet
amazon
harvester
rke2
s3gw
hobbyfarm
rancher-desktop
general
Title
k
kind-waitress-15815
12/02/2022, 9:25 AMIs there a good recommended method of deploying Rancher on Harvester... which would in turn manage the Harvester cluster?
w
witty-jelly-95845
12/02/2022, 11:32 AMFor production I think the recommendation is probably to not do it - keep the Rancher managing Harvester separate from Harvester.
k
kind-waitress-15815
12/02/2022, 11:34 AMThat is pretty inconvenient. Would that mean I should dedicate at least 3 servers to run Harvester on and install Rancher on those servers to manage the other servers... then install Rancher on those servers to manage the 3 which do nothing other than host the Rancher hosting Harvester servers?
I only have 4 servers in the group right now. I don't have enough servers to run two clusters of three servers each.
And even then, I would need to install rancher on one group to install rancher on the other group to install rancher on the first group ... etc
So, I guess maybe the better way of thinking about this is. If I have 4 servers I can use to evaluate Harvester and Rancher and the core purpose of the evaluation is high availability and manageability, what is the best way to deploy Harvester and Rancher on those servers? And adding more servers is not a solution.
m
mysterious-boots-59774
12/02/2022, 6:31 PMWe’ve heard about this feedback and planning to address it in the v1.2.0 release. Currently we recommend to start a Rancher server in 3 VMs (with anti-affinity rule) on top of Harvester.
See https://github.com/harvester/harvester/issues/2679 for more info
👌 1