adamant-kite-43734
12/05/2025, 9:12 AMbland-article-62755
12/05/2025, 5:11 PMbland-article-62755
12/05/2025, 5:12 PMlsblk -fl show?fierce-zoo-18185
12/07/2025, 8:08 AM/dev/sdb), and from the UI it doesn’t seem possible to create a StorageClass that uses the boot device (/dev/sda).
So I wanted to confirm whether this limitation is expected.
Here is the output of lsblk -fl from the host:
NAME FSTYPE FSVER LABEL UUID FSAVAIL FSUSE% MOUNTPOINTS
loop0
ext2 1.0 COS_ACTIVE 929fd4fd-2295-4b9a-ab4c-fc8b6da36aff 1.2G 56% /
sda
sda1
sda2 ext4 1.0 COS_OEM 4fba76b1-5e3b-44db-b2ce-153c213dae3f 38M 1% /oem
sda3 ext4 1.0 COS_RECOVERY
0a06f934-70e2-4f92-b420-5346f03323f1
sda4 ext4 1.0 COS_STATE 57bb34ce-2ca9-4fda-8a23-539f98848710 10.6G 23% /run/initramfs/cos-state
sda5 ext4 1.0 COS_PERSISTENT
6c8f906a-66a1-46a2-bdb0-0e7cd5dfaed1 1.5T 4% /var/lib/longhorn
(plus various kubelet/system dirs)
sdb ext4 1.0 HARV_LH_DEFAULT
dfc5f58c-85d5-445a-8a0a-bc5efbd51ddc 7.2T 0% /var/lib/harvester/defaultdisk
From what I can see, Longhorn is using /dev/sda5 heavily for system components, which might explain why the UI doesn’t allow creating a StorageClass on the boot disk.
Just trying to confirm if the boot disk is intentionally unavailable for VM data volumes.