This message was deleted.
# harvestera
adamant-kite-43734
07/03/2024, 10:26 AMThis message was deleted.
s
salmon-city-57654
07/03/2024, 3:23 PMHi @worried-state-78253,
RWX is planned on the v1.4.0
So, currently, the Harvester CSI driver cannot support it.
The v1.4.0 should be released on 2024 Oct.
w
worried-state-78253
07/03/2024, 3:23 PMThanks for the info - thats good to know, we're managing with NFS for now, but not sure how that will scale, I saw the reply on Github
worried-state-78253
07/03/2024, 3:26 PMgets a real pain if you have multiple replicas of a pod and want them all to use the same storage, especially if they are running on different nodes etc, hopefully with longhorn volume which may be better distributed this will be more performant
s
salmon-city-57654
07/03/2024, 3:34 PMSorry for that. After some trade-off, we move this feature to v1.4.0 instead of v1.3.0.
If you are running the workload on the downstream cluster and want the RWX, I thought you needed the workaround as you mentioned on the GH issue.
So, seems you created an NFS service on the downstream cluster for the RWX use cases?
hopefully with longhorn volume which may be better distributed this will be more performantDoes this question also relate to the above workaround?
w
worried-state-78253
07/03/2024, 3:47 PMCurrently things are working fine with NFS, obviously it would be neater, simpler and hopefully more preferment when this feature is available - looking forward to its availability
🙌 1
s
salmon-city-57654
07/04/2024, 1:45 AMSure, Thanks for your patience. Hope you can use this feature in the coming v1.4.0!
2 Views