This message was deleted.
# rke2a
adamant-kite-43734
05/22/2024, 4:18 PMThis message was deleted.
✅ 1
c
creamy-pencil-82913
05/22/2024, 4:22 PMthe default for RKE2 standalone is not the same as Rancher’s default when provisioning clusters.
👍 1
creamy-pencil-82913
05/22/2024, 4:22 PMPick the one you want, based on your requirements
n
nice-businessperson-14225
05/22/2024, 4:29 PMThanks.
In this situation, is it still accurate that Canal is the only one with FIPS-compliance out of the box? This is the main requirement I'm looking after.
nice-businessperson-14225
05/22/2024, 4:32 PMI would ask around in the CNI communities, but I figure that RKE2 users are more aware/interested in FIPS-compliance than the average k8s user 🙂
c
creamy-pencil-82913
05/22/2024, 4:40 PMYou can see in the release notes which CNIs are FIPS Compliant
https://github.com/rancher/rke2/releases/tag/v1.30.0%2Brke2r1 for example
✅ 1
n
nice-businessperson-14225
05/22/2024, 5:03 PMPerfect, thank you!
nice-businessperson-14225
05/22/2024, 5:34 PM> the default for RKE2 standalone is not the same as Rancher’s default when provisioning clusters.
@creamy-pencil-82913 Out of curiosity, is there a particular reasoning for this? It's not immediately clear to me why say Canal couldn't also be the default when provisioning a new cluster.
c
creamy-pencil-82913
05/22/2024, 5:45 PMbackwards compatibility with RKE1
n
nice-businessperson-14225
05/22/2024, 5:54 PMCanal is also supported by RKE1 though, is it not? So, backwards compatibility in which sense?
c
creamy-pencil-82913
05/22/2024, 6:01 PMbackwards compatibility in terms of what you get by default when you provision a cluster from rancher
n
nice-businessperson-14225
05/22/2024, 6:04 PMAh I see, thanks
2 Views