This message was deleted.

And longhorn is fully talos compliant in v1.6.0?

it has talos support. I'm not sure yet what that means - IIRC longhorn was switching to non-iscsi in 1.6.0 but https://github.com/longhorn/longhorn/issues/3161 is closed pending release so I trust them 🙂

If I understand the talos project correctly in regards to why it wasn’t supporting longhorn before is exactly because of these iscsi calls … from a security perspective. Exciting!

I think there were other binaries missing too, and now longhorn works with just those two addons directly from sidero.

Yeah I’m also waiting on the RTM version of longhorn

yeah, apparently not in 1.6.0 for talos 😞

So now you’re saying that v1.6.0 of Longhorn will not fully support Talos?

https://github.com/longhorn/longhorn/issues/3161 is closed - https://deploy-preview-827--longhornio.netlify.app/docs/1.6.0/advanced-resources/os-distro-specific/talos-linux-support/ is the snapshot of the website that will be released. On there it says :

Limitations

• Exclusive to v1 data volume: currently, within a Talos Linux cluster, Longhorn only supports v1 data volume. The v2 data volume isn’t currently supported in this environment.

I believe that the v2 datavolume is the one giving us SPDK related performance features.