This message was deleted.
# k3s
a
This message was deleted.
b
I'm guessing you mean rancher installed on a k3s cluster?
And what do you mean by high?
Traffic between nodes, if you have Rancher, Longhorn, etc. can be a lot.
I'm not sure I can answer this, but I don't think I'd have a shot without knowing more.
Like what kind of switch and link do you have?
1/5/10GB?
Are they on the same VLAN/Switch?
Did you verify the trafic isn't leaving the switch?
l
everything is on k3s downstream cluster is a completely different network (customer on-prem), it sends a pretty good amount of data toward the rancher that is in our network check if anybody had a similar thing, at least that can exclude rancher/k3s from the equation
b
what's a good amount of data?
like how much actual bandwidth?
l
cca 3GB per hour
do not expect anything more then basic rancher to downstream communication
nothing more should happen
b
833.3 kB/s doesn't seem like a whole lot to me, but it does seem like more than what's needed.
b
curious about this too. I haven't gotten to analyzing traffic yet, but i flagged it as part of my PoC investigation as well.
l
i am suspecting that this could be some logs open on rancher what take good amount of traffic but no proof for it
b
Yeah that's true. There is quite a difference between when the UI is being viewed vs not
I'm using the rancher-monitoring chart, so I assumed it was related to that at the time.